Pissed, quite pissed

I can't stand it. Sigh. Juz had an argument with cm over James Gomez. We hold contrasting views. not surprisingly.

i haf NOT finished studyin for my paper tmr. it's morn paper. i'm so dead. i can kiss my hope of a B+ gdbye, n hope not to get a B- instead. hopes..

Go read e archive of election news articles at CNA.com. click here. Here, u can see e whole election has evolved into e Gomez saga. tis, is wad GE 2006 is abt. Gomez. at tis archive, if u do read carefully from e beginning or not so beginning, u will realise tt PAP ministers / MPs talk has flaws. many flaws. MM Lee, 82, has seen Singapore thru from 1959 till now. HE does NOT noe e law. He implores WP to remove Gomez as a candidate, n matter-of-factly says tt WP can continue to stand for elections in Aljunied. Tis is of cos, fervently echoed by other ministers, in particular, FM George Yeo, who's leading e PAP team in Aljunied.

Tis is UNLAWFUL. click here to read more.

So subsequently, George Yeo muz haf realised tis. He says WP cannot remove e candidature, but they can remove Gomez aft e polls so tt he cannot become an MP. 2 things. 1, congrats to WP. George Yeo has approved of ur win in Aljunied GRC. 2, how come e paper does NOT report of his FLIP-FLOP, akin to tt of SDP's members? shldn't a headline somewhere splash "George Yeo FLIP-FLOPS!"? well, at least he realised his mistake. did our dear MM come out to apologise for his HONEST (arrogant) mistake? DID HE? tis saga cannot help but make me wary of our judicial system. is someone or some ppl, the law?

i'm worked up. honestly. i was raising my voice over e phone, arguing w a very gd fren, over a minority candidate form. sigh. they always say tt e side who lacks reason in e argument tends to raise his voice in hope tt amplitude overwhelms. is it realli e case? did i lack reason in e argument? i duno. mabe i did.

sorry cm. i din mean to shout into e phone, realli.

mabe i was overwhelmed with pity for WP, n Gomez. Reading blogs all over e place, i see an underlying issue, rather than e Gomez integrity n wadeva else. of cos, u can say i'm blinded by bloggers who now control my tots on e election issues. tt my growing detest of e state media pushes me to agree w whoever criticises e media. u haf ur view. i shall accept ur view.

i dun expect u ppl to see e flaws in PAP's talk. honestly, i dun. personally, i'm not a believer of opposition for e sake of opposition. But there's no need for me to believe so, bcoz i feel tt there r worthy opposition candidates deserving office. of cos when SM Goh said tt Chiam is too old, he wasn't implying MM Lee to step down. no he din. of cos, when e whole of PAP continues to harp on Gomez; Low Thia Kiang n e whole of WP begs e nation to come back to impt issues reg e nation; George Yeo "breaks ranks" to comment to media for everyone to come back to issues rather than Gomez - OF COS all these DID NOT lead me to wonder who was not addressing issues. of cos, George Yeo is foreign minister, n his whole election campaign did NOT touch on ANY foreign policies or issues. of cos.

i'm to blame for it. of cos! who else? bcoz me, n ppl like me, haf not been able to induce them to talk abt anythin else but candidates. are issues impt? of cos they are! but candidates are more impt! "Low Thia Kiang has not reached e credibility of Chiam," someone said. "Can we not question e integrity of Gomez?" another one said. "SDP does not have a common stand," someone said. "Chiam is not very gd at talent spotting - look at Chee, Ling n blah," another one said.

this, my dear frens, is General Elections 2006. if u haf not realised, welcome.